Successes
Our Successes
We have had many successes in the last few years. We are grateful we were able to help so many people who were charged with federal crimes in New York and New Jersey (as well as some clients charged with New Jersey State matters). We have set forth some of our successes below, which include many of our clients’ receiving substantial downward variances at sentencing and the outright dismissal of charges. we will continue to fight the fight – helping people who are charged or threatened with federal criminal matters. We will continue to dedicate our efforts to seeking and/or obtaining the best resolutions for our clients. At LGR Law Group, we fight for your rights and protect your freedom.
US v. SC
following a guilty plea to possession of a weapon, we were able to obtain a 60-month sentence for a client who was facing 120-150 months imprisonment.
US V. A.N.
we successfully negotiated a time-served plea agreement for a client facing approximately 10 years imprisonment for federal drug charges.
US V. LB
we successfully convinced the government to file a motion requesting a reduction in our client’s sentence, after he was convicted of serious drug crimes, due in part to his serious health problems.
US V. FV AND PB
our two clients who were swept up in a large-scale government corruption investigation received substantially lesser sentences than other similarly situated individuals who were sentenced in this investigation. One our clients received no jail time and the other received only 2 months imprisonment, despite that both of them were facing sentences that exposed them to substantially more jail time.
US V. A.K
after months of negotiation, we were able to get a drug conspiracy charge against our client dismissed that carried a 10-year statutory mandatory term of imprisonment.
US V. CR
in November 2024, we obtained a 24-month sentence for a client who was facing approximately 17 years in prison for drug and gun charges.
US V. JG
We were able to get our client a below guideline sentence for a wire fraud conviction.
US V. KS
in October 2024, we successfully convinced the court to adjourn our client’s sentencing date in an attempt to reduce his sentence. He was facing 37 to 46 months imprisonment.
US V. FL
in September 2024, we were able to get our client resentenced to time-served after being sentenced to 22 years in prison in 2015 for violating federal drug laws.
US V. AH
in August 2024, we were able to obtain a sentence of 3 years of supervised release for a client who was facing 27 to 33 months in prison for conspiracy to violate federal anti-kick back statutes.
US V. BB
in July 2024, we were able to secure a sentence of one month home detention for a client charged with violating the terms of his supervised release. He was facing 4-10 months imprisonment.
US v. FJ
Client’s violation of federal supervised release – case dismissed.
(NJ STATE MATTER)
Client charged with assault – case dismissed.
SRATE V. PH
our client was originally facing 17 years in a child endangerment matter. We were able to negotiate a plea with the state to a sentence of 8 years in prison, 5 years of parole ineligibility.
US v. GS (SDNY)
Client in a federal fraud matter received a below variance of 13 months from the advisory federal guidelines.
US v. CR (NJ)
Client in a drug conspiracy with advisory federal sentencing guidelines of 37-46 months received a variance to 15 months in prison.
US v. JA(SDNY)
Client in his third federal drug offense conviction and Violation of Supervised Release, was facing and advisory federal guideline sentence of between 46 and 57 months, plus 12 months for his supervised release violation, received a sentence of 39 months total (supervised release violation was 12 months but ran concurrently), for a total downward variance of at least 19 months.
US v. CC (SDNY)
Client in a federal felon in possession matter received a 2-year sentence after trial.
US v. MM (NJ)
Client was facing potential sentence of between 87-108 months in prison pursuant to the advisory federal sentencing guidelines. We were able to secure a Rule 11(c)(1)(c) plea for our client to the mandatory minimum sentence of five years. Client received a five-year sentence.
US v. AE (NJ)
Client in a $2 million plus PPP and EIDL fraud matter received a sentence to the below advisory federal sentencing guidelines.
US v. MV (SDNY)
Client in a federal drug conspiracy matter with a related fentanyl death had advisory federal sentencing guidelines of 108 – 135. We were able to obtain a variance to the mandatory minimum sentence of 60 months – more than a 4-year variance from the bottom of his advisory guideline range.
US v. FPL (NJ)
Client charged with federal felon in possession (18 USC § 922(g)). We were able to obtain a plea to a non-deportable crime (a misprision of a felony, 18 USC §4) and client received time served sentence. Our client did NOT get deported
USA v. MT(SDNY)
Client in a drug conspiracy was facing 27 -33 months pursuant to the Sentencing Guidelines. The Court varied downward to 20 months.
USA v. FPL (DNJ)
Client (who had been living in the US since he was an infant) was facing deportation with a felon in possession charge (federal firearms offense). While collaborating with client’s immigration attorney, we were able to obtain a plea to a misprision (with a 364-day sentence) to avoid client’s deportation.
USA v. ST(DNJ)
Client charged with drug conspiracy and guns with a Guideline range of between 106 – 117. We secured a Rule (c)(1)(C) plea for client for a sentence between 72 – 90 months in prison. Government asked for a 90-month sentence. Court sentenced client to 75 months.
USA v. JO (SDNY)
Client charged in drug conspiracy (meth) facing potential Guideline sentence of between 292 – 365. Probation recommended a 180-month sentence, and client received 130-month sentence.
USA v. KW(DNJ)
Client charged with fraud in relation to receiving veteran benefits. Court varied downward from a 12 to18 month custodial sentence and sentenced client to probation.
USA v. TD(DNJ)
We were able to get drug and felon in possession (firearm) charges dismissed with prejudice against our client.
USA v. JO (SDNY)
Client charged with PPP and EIDL loan fraud with a $200,000 amount of loss, received a one-year probation sentence.
USA v. Moore (DNJ)
Client charged with drugs and a gun and was on Federal Supervised Release when charged. We were able to secure a Rule 11 (c)(1)(C) plea with a sentence of between 24 – 36 months in prison. Client received a 24-month sentence, and the Court imposed no additional time for his Violation of Supervised Release.
USA v. DL (SDNY)
Client charged with drug conspiracy. His Guidelines were between 135 and 168 months in prison, and both the Government and Probation recommended 135 months in prison. Client received a 60-month sentence.
USA v. EB (SDNY)
Client charged with PPP and EIDL loan fraud whose Guidelines recommended a prison sentence, and who ultimately received a 15-month probationary sentence.
USA v. OA (SDNY)
Client charged with fentanyl drug conspiracy with Guidelines of between 130 and 168 months in prison. Client received 120-month sentence.
State v. LJ (State NJ)
Client received probation sentence for three second degree drug offenses.
USA v. AC (DNJ)
Client charged with murder for hire with Guidelines close to 10 years. Obtained a Rule 11 (c)(1)(C) plea for client requiring client to serve 36 months in prison, which client was sentenced to.
USA v. SP (SDNY)
Client was allegedly a career offender with a potential sentence of between 155 – 188 months in prison for drug distribution. Client received as sentence of 86 months.
USA v. EM (SDNY)
Client committed a Hobbs Act Robbery leaving the victim paralyzed. Government requested an above Guideline sentence of 180 months. Client received a Guideline sentence of 108 months.
USA v. DW (DNJ)
Client convicted of carjacking, received a sentence of 60 months. His advisory Guidelines were between 92 – 115. We were able to negotiate a Rule 11 (c) (1)(C) plea agreement for 60 months.
USA v. RV (SDNY)
Client (who had absconded after pleading guilty and was MIA for over a year) pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bank fraud and the Government sought a sentence of 30 months plus a consecutive sentence for a related Violation of Supervised Release. Client received a 24-month sentence, and only two additional months for the Supervised Release violation.
USA v. ER (DNJ)
Client was facing between 21 – 28 months in prison and received one year probation for wire fraud.
USA v. Goodman (DNJ): Client was charged with conspiracy to distribute drugs. His Guidelines were between 46 -57 months in prison. We were able to obtain a Rule (c)(1)(C) plea for client to a term of probation. He was sentenced to five years’ probation.
USA v. DV (SDNY)
Client facing potential of between 151 – 180 months in prison for a drug conspiracy matter. Probation asked for 48 months in jail, and the Government argued that client’s Guidelines were between 151 and 188 months in prison. Client received a sentence of 36 months in prison (over a 100-month downward variance).
USA v. KS (DNJ)
Client was charged with distributing a large amount of illegal drugs. His Guidelines were 210 – 262 months in prison. Client received a 168-month sentence (a 42-month downward variance).
State v. MF (State NJ)
We were able to get the State in Bergen County to outrightly dismiss four charges against our client: 3rd degree terroristic threats, 4th degree unlawful possession of a weapon, 3rd degree criminal mischief, and 4th degree stalking.
USA v. JP (SDNY)
Violation of supervised release with a potential 2-year statutory maximum sentence for various violations. US Probation sought 13 months in prison. Client received an 8-month sentence with no supervision to follow.
USA v. IR (DNJ)
Possession with intent to distribute charges. Client was facing an advisory Guideline range of between 46 – 57 months in prison. US Probation and Government sought within Guideline sentence. Client received probationary sentence (a 46-month downward variance)
USA v. AVR (SDNY)
Client was charged with transporting in the US an extremely large amount of illegal drugs. His Guidelines were between 108 and 135 months in prison. Client received a 36-month sentence, a 68-month downward variance.
USA v. EB (SDNY)
Money laundering/wire fraud charges. Sentencing Guidelines (“USSG”) had an advisory range of between 135 – 188 months in jail. Client received time-served sentence (which amounted to one day in jail).
USA v. DH (DNJ)
Possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine charges. Guidelines suggested 10-16 months in prison. Client received time-served sentence (one day in jail).
USA v. DC (SDNY)
Drug conspiracy charges. Guidelines suggested 30 – 37 months in prison. US Probation requested 30 months and the AUSA requested a USSG sentence (between 30 -37). Client received an 8-month prison sentence (a 28-month downward variance).
These are only some of the outcomes that resulted from our hard work, knowledge and dedication to our clients at LGR Law Group, and we will continue to bring these same attributes to the table in working for our clients.
© Copyright 2025 LGR Law LLC. All rights reserved.
Digital Marketing By 